Lawmakers in Arizona are considering a major shift in tax policy that could impact thousands of workers in the service industry. A proposed bill aims to make tips exempt from state income tax, aligning with a promise made by former President Donald Trump.
Supporters argue this would provide relief to tipped employees, but critics warn it could significantly impact state revenue and worker benefits in the long run.
The Push for Tax-Free Tips
House Bill 2081, introduced by Rep. Gail Griffin, seeks to redefine tips as a “gift” rather than taxable income. Under this proposal, Arizona’s tipped workers—who earn an average of $10,000 annually in gratuities—would save roughly $250 per year. While this may seem like a small benefit per worker, the broader impact would be substantial, with an estimated $31 million in lost tax revenue for the state.

kjzz.org | Rep. Gail Griffin’s House Bill 2081 proposes classifying tips as non-taxable gifts.
During a legislative hearing, Rep. Mariana Sandoval expressed mixed feelings about the proposal. “As a mother of servers, I understand the appeal of this bill,” she said. “But losing $31 million in state revenue is a serious concern.”
Critics argue that while the bill offers short-term relief, it fails to address deeper issues in the service industry, such as low base wages and financial instability.
The Impact on State Revenue and Public Services
Opponents of the bill argue that exempting tips from taxation benefits businesses more than workers. Currently, Arizona law mandates that employers pay at least $14.70 per hour, but restaurants can count tips toward this requirement, effectively reducing what they contribute to wages.
Labor advocate Brendan Walsh believes the focus should be on raising wages rather than tax breaks. “Lowering taxes for working people sounds good in theory,” he said. “But if we’re cutting state revenue, we should be increasing taxes on corporations and the wealthy instead of taking money away from schools and public services.”
Arizona has a history of strong voter support for fair wages. In the past, Republican lawmakers attempted to reduce the tipped minimum wage, but voters overwhelmingly rejected the measure. Many see this new tax exemption proposal as another attempt to weaken protections for service workers.
A Fair Tax System or a Political Strategy?
Supporters of the bill, including lobbyist Jeremy Garrett, argue that service workers shouldn’t be taxed on the tips they receive. “Income tax shouldn’t be the reason people in the service industry struggle to afford basic necessities,” Garrett said.
However, others see this as a political move rather than genuine concern for workers. Rep. Seth Blattman questioned the motivations behind the bill. “Both parties want to help struggling families,” he said. “But real support comes from well-funded public programs, not tax cuts that leave essential services underfunded.”
Blattman proposed an amendment to limit the tax exemption to lower-income workers, ensuring high-earning professionals couldn’t abuse the system by misclassifying wages as tips. The amendment was rejected by the majority.
The Hidden Cost to Workers

Instagram | gop | Arizona considers a tax policy change to exclude tips from state income, following Trump’s commitment.
While exempting tips from taxation may seem beneficial, it could have unintended consequences. Social Security and other benefits are calculated based on taxable income. If tipped earnings are no longer taxed, workers could see lower retirement and disability benefits in the future.
An analysis of similar policies suggests that while workers might save a few hundred dollars a year in taxes, they could lose thousands annually in Social Security benefits upon retirement.
Walsh summed up the concerns of many opponents: “This isn’t about helping workers. It’s about cutting taxes while ignoring long-term consequences.”
The Bigger Picture
Arizona’s service industry plays a major role in the state’s economy. Any changes to tax policies affecting tipped income could have widespread implications. While tax breaks might provide short-term relief, long-term financial stability comes from fair wages and strong worker protections.
With voters historically rejecting attempts to reduce tipped wages, the outcome of this bill will be closely watched. Whether Arizona lawmakers prioritize tax cuts or worker stability remains to be seen.